Control theory implies an active role, or
responsibility towards one's behavior. Much of his book is concerned
with the behaviors we choose as we attempt to control our lives.
Glasser claims that all behavior is made up of three components:
what we do, what we think, and what we feel. According to Glasser,
all behavior is an attempt to satisfy powerful forces within
ourselves. He argues that regardless of our circumstances, all
we do, think, and feel is always or best attempt at the time
to satisfy the forces within us.
Sometimes, this behavior may be ineffective or even destructive.
For example, Glasser describes psychosomatic Illness, drug addiction,
and other radical behaviors as an individuals struggling to gain
control of their lives in the best way they know how. Conversely,
he illustrates why some people give up when feeling they have
lost control. This ineffective behavior may persists even when
other options later become available.
Others may choose depressing or anxieting, or perhaps the
act of headaching or phobicking may make more sense to them.
For Glasser, feelings are better expressed as verbs. Adjectives
such as depressed and anxious or nouns such as headache or phobia
suggest a passive role. Glasser expresses the importance of this
sort of language. By using the right language carefully, we may
emphasize our control over everyday situations.
Glasser explains in his book why we are typically unaware
that we choose much of our misery. Glasser gives four reasons
why we choose misery. They include;
- To keep angering under control,
- To get others to help us out,
- To excuse our unwillingness to do something more effective,
- To gain powerful control.
By accepting misery is a choice, Glasser predicts you will
find better choices to replace it. Glasser states, "We almost
always have choices, and the better the choice, the more we will
be in control of our lives." This includes choices of not
only how to act but how we feel as well. How we feel is not controlled
by others or events, unless we choose to allow it to. He understands
that we sometimes feel we've lost control of their lives or we
feel we're in a hopeless situation. Even in these situations,
Glasser maintains that we can choose to feel miserable or we
can learn to make better choices that are available to us.
Glasser invites the reader to think of at least a few people
who they know who made a better choice than misery when they
have been laid off from a good job. He points out that somehow,
without fear or resentment, they dealt with this situation as
a challenge and chose not to be overwhelmed.
Even for those of us who may not be in such a desperate situation,
Glasser claims taking control of our lives is more likely when
understand control theory. By putting control theory to work
in our lives, we will spend our energy attacking the problem
rather than blaming it. Glasser urges us to take the time to
figure out flexible and creative behaviors that may be more effective
in our lives.
Beyond the need to breath, Glasser identifies five needs that
together make up the forces that seem to drive most people. They
- The need to survive and reproduce,
- The need to belong (love, share, and cooperate),
- The need for power,
- The need for freedom, and
- The need for fun
He seems to recognize that there may be other needs, but he
sees these five to be the predominate needs of most individuals.
Glasser specifies control is not a need; it is a way we must
function to fulfill our needs.
Glasser states, "... our need to belong; because we need
each other, we are willing to accept some control-but not too
much. Our lives, therefore, are a continual struggle to gain
control in a way that we satisfy our needs and not deprive those
around us, especially those close to us, of satisfying theirs."
Glasser describes how early on we learn how to deal with our
environment to satisfy our needs. Behaviors and values that satisfied
our needs in the past often may not serve as the best means later
on in life or under different circumstances.
Glasser illustrates, when we satisfy a need by doing something,
we store a picture of what satisfies us in a place in our heads.
Glasser calls this place our personal picture album. We learn
early on that when we want to satisfy a need, we will start turning
the pages of our album. Glasser points out, though, we often
have pictures in our albums that cannot be satisfied in the real
world. Our relentless effort to satisfy our pictures may become
self-destructive, or socially unacceptable in some cases. Glasser
discusses examples of people of suicidal tendencies, anorexics,
alcoholics, and homosexuals.
It is important to realize that no two people can share the
same pictures. Glasser suggests this realization must be an integral
part of the way we deal with everyone around us. Many of these
pictures can be very difficult to change, but change is still
possible. Glasser explains that forcing a change is usually counterproductive.
To get along with someone and perhaps eventually persuade them
to change some of their pictures, we need to begin by trying
to find some pictures that you share with them. Glasser discusses
further how this process further develops into a more productive
relationship. Related topics such as conflict, criticism, and
raising children are also discussed in his book.
Glasser explains how our behavior is our attempt to reduce
the difference between what we want (our picture in our heads)
and what we have (the way we see situations in the world). This
behavior involves acting, thinking, feeling, or may involve our
bodies. Glasser discusses why we often hang on to a picture in
our heads, even if it means in engaging ineffective behaviors.
Glasser recognizes four separate components of what is he calls
total behavior, doing (or active behaviors), thinking, feeling,
and physiology. He claims that the more we are able to recognize
all of the different components of our behavior, the more we
will be in control of our lives. He explains it is impossible
to choose a total behavior and not choose all of its components.
If we want to change behavior, we can choose to change its doing
and thinking components. Regardless of how we feel, we always
have some control over what we do. Glasser explains, "...,
I have no ability to change how I feel, separate from what I
do or think, but I have almost complete ability to change what
I do, and some ability to change what I think, regardless of
how I am choosing to feel."
Glasser explains that we are not controlled by external events,
difficult as they may be. "Nothing we do is caused by what
happens outside of us. If we believe that what we do is caused
by forces outside of us, we are acting like dead machines, not
living people." We must take responsibility for our actions.
Glasser credits his introduction to control theory to Willian
T. Powers highly theoretical book Behavior: The Control of
Perception (Chicago: Aldine, 1973). Although control theory
has been supported by research, Glasser points out that his book,
Control Theory, is a book of ideas, not research. Glasser
expresses his gratitude to Dr Ellen J. Langer of Harvard University
for compiling much of this corroborating research in her book,
The Psychology of Control (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications,
This book teaches the principles of control theory to help
the reader gain effective control of their lives. The reader
will learn to make more effective choices rather than the ineffective
and painful ones we often make in attempt to satisfy our powerful
and unrelenting needs. Glasser advises, though, to truly learn
control theory, we must give up our lifelong, common sense belief
that we must merely react to events around us. He warns the reader
that this may not be an easy change. He adds, that lifelong beliefs
die hard, particularly if they are held by almost everyone you
know. Finally, Glasser encourages the reader to be skeptical
of the concepts explained in his book. He states, "Believe
nothing in this book, no matter how persuasive my argument, unless
you try it out in your life and discover it works for you."
I found several unique features in reviewing Glasser's Control
Theory. This included the concept of psychosomatic Illness,
alcoholism, drug addiction, and other radical behaviors as being
a futile ritual in attempt to gain control of one's life. Likewise,
the concepts of affect such as depression and anxiety were unique
in their construct.
I agree with Glasser's schema of doing and thinking being
the primary driving force, although I find personal value in
exploring and sharing feelings with my professional clients and
friends. In retrospect, perhaps the humanistic and reality theories
do not have to be mutually exclusive after all.
I find the practical strengths of this theory to be its emphasis
on individual responsibility and action. I enjoyed the helpful
analogies and short stories Glasser used to illustrate his points.
Although, one may argue that Glasser's Control Theory
possesses scientific lackluster, I feel both the content (or
lack of) and the non-technical writing style targets the audience
it seemed to be targeting.