I've been training with weights for 15 years. I probably
have not missed more than a week's worth of working out in that
time. I love training and thought I knew a lot about it. Just
recently I came to the sad conclusion that I have spent way too
much time in the gym over the years. I, like so many others who
grew up in the 80s, used to do 20+ sets per bodypart per workout.
According to the scientific literature all I needed to do was
1 work set after a warmup twice a week per bodypart to achieve
the same results (See Low
Volume Progressive Intensity Training). You are likewise
a bodybuilder. Do you train with low volume? I need a support
group for others who have wasted so much time in the gym.
began serious bodybuilding training, December 1979. "Arnold,
the Education of a Bodybuilder" was my original inspiration
and guide. Throughout my competitive career (see some of my competition
picts on some of the pages in the bodybuilding
section) I trained with multiple sets although I had always tried
to get the most out of the least possible number of sets and
After I retired from competition in 1990 and still a bit skeptical
of very low volume training, I experimented with performing only
one warm up and two sets (down from my typical 3 workout sets)
per exercise. Eventually I adopted single set training (after
a warm-up set) out of necessity during my master's studies. I
haven't looked back since.
I'm rapidly approaching 50 now. Although I can't perform set
after set of squats like I used to...
Once in the old days, a powerlifter friend and I started started
working out together for a short stint. Soon after we got started,
he suddenly disappeared while we were doing squats! After I finally
finished my sets of squats, I later found him in the bathroom
lying down practically moaning with his leg propped up on the
wall and his hand on his belly. He told me that he had lost his
dinner because he wasn't used to so little rest between his sets
Being able to perform set after set is not important to me
any more, particularly as you have reiterated, you receive the
most benefits from the first workout set anyway.
You may find, since you are spending less time in the weight
room, you may have to perform a bit more cardio or eat accordingly
to compensate for the shorter weight training workouts. Besides
that, I've experienced nothing but benefits: faster recovery
between workouts, more strength gains, fewer overuse injuries,
less need to perform more than a single warm-up set, opportunity
to work a few more miscellaneous body-parts, and more time with
the wife and kids.
Sorry, I know of no low volume support group but perhaps you
can find an online forum board that advocate high intensity training
or abbreviated workouts for hard gainers with similar philosophies.
Best of luck.
Thanks so much for your quick response. I cannot tell you
how impressed I am with your web page. Your page is the most
comprehensive yet concise resource for fitness with the latest
scientific information. I have changed my routine based on your
recommendations for the last two weeks and already feel like
a new person. I have so much more energy in my day to day life
from not spending hours upon hours in the gym every week. My
strength gains in the last two weeks are better than what I've
gained in the last year. I'm not exaggerating. I feel like I
need to tell everyone who is wasting away in the gym how to workout
based on a scientifically proven method.
I have a question in regard
for Resistance Training Exercise (ACSM, 1995 ; ACSM, 2002).
I get the impression that you strongly advocate for low-volume
high intensity training if muscle growth is your objective.
The ACSM 2002 recommendation however, which you cite, indicates
higher volume, multiple-set programs. Could you please
clarify your stand on this matter?
Yes, you could say I advocate low-volume training in general
but that is not to say I am suggesting single-set or mono-volume
training. I do not deny a number of benefits of periodic high-volume
training for both strength and hypertrophy. I also recognized
individual difference as well as particular ergogenic aids that
allow some people to better tolerate and prosper from well designed
higher volume training programs.
The scientific studies
show a single set is sufficient for beginners and multiple sets
are only modestly more effective for experienced trainees at
best. It appears that the ideal number of sets required per exercise
or muscle group both strength and muscle mass gains is quite
small in comparison to what many coaches and trainees have been
Personally, I perform I only perform one warm-up (50% workout
resistance) and a single workout set for each exercise, choosing
only one to two exercises per muscle group. One exception for
me is on my first quad / glute exercises (squats, leg press,
deadlift, etc) where I typically perform a pre-warmup set with
a very light weight. And on occasion I might perform a third
exercise for my chest (chest dips, dumbbell pullover, etc).
Incidentally an additional exercise for a muscle group is
far more effective for strength or muscle mass as opposed to
an additional set(s) as long as the auxiliary exercise is distinctly
different from your other movements. For a hard gainer like myself,
it is important to budget the number of exercises and sets in
a workout by restricting the number of additional movements to
only the most lagging muscle group(s).
With too many exercises, the workout becomes too long and
intensity drops for all exercises, not only near the end of the
program when you get fatigued, but also eventually at the beginning
of your workout when you advertently begin to pace yourself by
holding back early on.
James Griffing, ExRx.net